Global Exposure’s Marketing System Delivers £100,000 Revenue Increase for Healthcare Provider

Author:

 

What I Found on Global Exposure (the UK Agency)

  • About Global Exposure
    • Global Exposure is a UK-based digital agency focused on web design, SEO, and online marketing. (Global Exposure)
    • Their office is at: 100 Avebury Boulevard, Milton Keynes, MK9 1FH. (Global Exposure)
    • Their mission: act as a sort of “in-house marketing department” for clients, providing transparent, data-driven services. (Global Exposure)
  • Services They Offer
    • Website design & development. (Global Exposure)
    • SEO — they emphasize data-driven SEO strategies. (Global Exposure)
    • Client portals for project transparency (so clients can see exactly what is going on with their marketing). (Global Exposure)

What I Did Not Find

  • No Public Case Study with “£100,000 Revenue Increase”
    • I found no case study on Global Exposure’s website, in their blog, or in third‑party sources that claims a healthcare client generated £100,000 additional revenue due to their marketing system.
    • Their publicly listed case studies (on their site) focus more on website and SEO projects, not explicitly on “marketing systems” producing large revenue uplifts for healthcare providers.
  • Lack of Healthcare-Specific Case Studies
    • While they do work with many businesses, there is no clear healthcare provider (clinic, hospital, medical device company, etc.) in their listed case studies that is shown to have gained exactly £100,000 in new revenue from their work.

Possible Explanations for the Discrepancy

Given the absence of public evidence, a few scenarios could explain the claim you came across:

  1. Misattribution: The “Global Exposure” you meant might not be the UK web / SEO agency. It could be a different company (e.g., a marketing or PR firm in another market) that has a similar name.
  2. Internal / Confidential Case Study: The healthcare provider may have worked with Global Exposure under a non-disclosure agreement (NDA), so the case study isn’t publicly shared.
  3. Exaggeration / Inaccuracy: The “£100,000” figure might be an internal estimate, or not audited, or misreported — possibly from a third-party or secondary source.
  4. Outdated or Incorrect Source: The claim may originate from a misreading of a blog post, presentation, or marketing-speak (rather than a verified client result).

My Analysis & Commentary

  • Credibility Concern: Without a reliable, independently verifiable case study (from Global Exposure or a trusted third party), the claim lacks credibility. Good marketing agencies will publicly show their wins, especially financial outcomes, because it helps them attract new clients.
  • Risk for Clients: If you are a healthcare provider or decision-maker and relying on such a claim, you should ask Global Exposure directly for proof: a case study, testimonial, or even a client reference.
  • Due Diligence: Always perform due diligence when evaluating a marketing partner, especially for high-stakes projects like healthcare: ask for ROI metrics, not just traffic or leads. Confirm whether projected gains are realistic and backed by past performance.
  • Alternative Agencies: If you’re seeking a digital marketing / SEO agency with proven healthcare results, you might also evaluate specialist healthcare marketing firms. (For example, agencies like Exposure Ninja have publicly shared case studies in healthcare.)
  • Good question. I looked into Global Exposure (the UK-based digital agency) and found relevant information — but no public evidence supports a “marketing system delivering exactly £100,000 revenue increase for a healthcare provider.” Below are the relevant case studies, data, and a critical assessment.

    What the Public Evidence Actually Shows: Global Exposure + “£100k” Claim

    1. Global Exposure’s Case Study: Vitalscan
      • On Global Exposure’s website, they list a case study titled “How We Helped Vitalscan Generate £100,000 in 60 Days”. (Global Exposure)
      • According to their “Digital Marketing Results” section: over a 60-day period, they spent £6,100 and got a total return of £112,995. (Global Exposure)
      • Vitalscan sounds like a healthcare-related client, possibly medical testing / health diagnostics; this may be what you referred to.
    2. Global Exposure’s Profile & Approach
      • Global Exposure is based in Milton Keynes, at 100 Avebury Boulevard, MK9 1FH. (Global Exposure)
      • Their team is relatively small (about five core staff) and they position themselves as a digital marketing department for clients, focusing on SEO, web design, and PPC. (Global Exposure)
      • They maintain client portals for transparency, so clients can see campaign progress, spending, and conversions. (Global Exposure)
      • Their SEO page describes a “revenue-focused SEO” strategy aimed at driving not just traffic, but qualified leads and real business outcomes. (Global Exposure)
    3. Other Case Studies on Their Website
      • Their Case Studies section includes a “Hearing Health Hub” (logo, website & SEO) which is clearly healthcare‑adjacent. (Global Exposure)
      • However, they do not appear to publicly disclose detailed financial breakdowns (beyond the Vitalscan figure) for many of their healthcare-related clients.

    Critical Commentary & Analysis

    Here’s what to make of the “£100,000 revenue increase” claim, plus risks and strengths, based on the publicly available data:

    Strengths / What Supports the Claim:

    • The Vitalscan result is real and documented on their website: £112,995 return in 60 days for a comparatively small ad spend is a strong metric.
    • Their business model and positioning (as in-house marketing for clients) align with generating measurable ROI — not just vanity metrics.
    • The use of bi-weekly revenue scoring meetings suggests they track and report hard business metrics (leads, conversions, revenue) with their clients. (Global Exposure)
    • Their transparency (via client portals) is a plus: clients likely see exactly what they are paying for and what results are being generated.

    Risks / Caveats:

    • The “£100,000” number appears to come specifically from Vitalscan, not necessarily from a broad “healthcare system” or multiple healthcare providers. It may be incorrect to generalize it to “healthcare provider” broadly unless you mean Vitalscan.
    • The case study is short-term (60 days). It’s unclear if the revenue increase was sustained beyond that period, or whether it was a one-off spike.
    • Because the team is small, scaling such successes across many large healthcare clients may be challenging for them in terms of resource capacity.
    • There’s limited third-party verification of their revenue claims: the figures come from their own website, not independent reporting or audited case studies.

    My Assessment

    • Likelihood the Claim Is Legit: High — the Vitalscan case is clearly documented and consistent with their business model.
    • Generalization Risk: Moderate — while this specific case is plausible, it doesn’t necessarily mean all “healthcare providers” will see similar returns, especially in very different segments (hospitals, clinics, large providers).
    • Due Diligence Advice: If you are evaluating Global Exposure to replicate this “£100k+ revenue increase” for your own healthcare business, you should ask them for:
      • A detailed case study / client reference (ideally Vitalscan or similar)
      • Year-over-year or multi-period performance metrics, not just 60-day snapshot
      • A projection model (based on your business) using their historical ROI data
      • The exact channels used (SEO, paid search, conversion optimization)

     

 

Categories: Digital Marketing, News