{"id":17301,"date":"2025-11-01T14:10:43","date_gmt":"2025-11-01T14:10:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/?p=17301"},"modified":"2025-11-01T14:10:43","modified_gmt":"2025-11-01T14:10:43","slug":"adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/","title":{"rendered":"Adidas Argues in Appeal That Thom Browne\u2019s Email \u201cError\u201d Constitutes Misconduct"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_76 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#Background_to_the_case\" >Background to the case<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#The_%E2%80%9Cemail_errormisconduct%E2%80%9D_issue\" >The \u201cemail error\/misconduct\u201d issue<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#Legal_procedural_significance\" >Legal \/ procedural significance<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#Implications_for_the_brands\" >Implications for the brands<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#Bottom%E2%80%91line_summary\" >Bottom\u2011line summary<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#Case_Study%E2%80%AF1_US_Litigation_%E2%80%93_Email_Non%E2%80%91Production_Rule%E2%80%AF60b_Appeal\" >Case Study\u202f1: U.S. Litigation \u2013 Email Non\u2011Production &amp; Rule\u202f60(b) Appeal<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#Case_Study%E2%80%AF2_UK_Litigation_%E2%80%93_Position_Marks_Broader_Brand_Strategy\" >Case Study\u202f2: UK Litigation \u2013 Position Marks &amp; Broader Brand Strategy<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#Comments_Reflections\" >Comments &amp; Reflections<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#Final_Summary\" >Final Summary<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Background_to_the_case\"><\/span>Background to the case<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>adidas sued Thom\u202fBrowne in the U.S. (and is continuing to pursue related litigation) over Thom\u202fBrowne\u2019s \u201cfour\u2011bar\u201d stripe design, alleging it infringed adidas\u2019s iconic \u201cthree\u2011stripe\u201d mark. A jury in the U.S. found in favour of Thom\u202fBrowne. (<a title=\"Thom Browne wins case against Adidas over stripes\" href=\"https:\/\/www.voguebusiness.com\/fashion\/thom-browne-wins-case-against-adidas-over-stripes?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Vogue Business<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>In the U.K., Thom\u202fBrowne counter\u2011sued adidas seeking declarations of invalidity or revocation of several of adidas\u2019s \u201cthree\u2011stripe\u201d position trade\u2011marks. The High Court (Mrs\u202fJustice\u202fJoanna\u202fSmith) in December\u202f2024 found that eight of adidas\u2019s position marks were invalid for lack of registrability. (<a title=\"Thom-Browne-Inc.-v-Adidas.pdf\" href=\"https:\/\/www.judiciary.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Thom-Browne-Inc.-v-Adidas.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Courts and Tribunals Judiciary<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>On appeal, the Court of Appeal (23\u202fOct\u202f2025) upheld the High Court\u2019s decision, dismissing adidas\u2019s appeal regarding six of its position marks. (<a title=\"Court of Appeal upholds the invalidity of adidas three stripe ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oeclaw.co.uk\/news\/view\/court-of-appeal-upholds-the-invalidity-of-adidas-three-stripe-position-marks?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">oeclaw.co.uk<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Parallel proceedings in the U.S. also continue. In one appeal, adidas argues that Thom\u202fBrowne should not have prevailed because the designer failed to produce key internal emails during discovery. (<a title=\"Adidas Argues Discovery Blunder Requires New Trademark Trial (1)\" href=\"https:\/\/news.bloomberglaw.com\/ip-law\/adidas-argues-discovery-blunder-requires-new-trademark-trial?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">news.bloomberglaw.com<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_%E2%80%9Cemail_errormisconduct%E2%80%9D_issue\"><\/span>The \u201cemail error\/misconduct\u201d issue<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>At the heart of the appeal in the U.S. (before the Second Circuit) is adidas\u2019s argument under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2) and 60(b)(3) that Thom\u202fBrowne\u2019s non\u2011production of four internal emails constituted <em>misconduct<\/em> (Rule\u202f60(b)(3)) or at least improper non\u2011production\/negligence. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Adidas\u2019s position:\n<ul>\n<li>The four emails were identified and flagged for review during discovery (by Thom\u202fBrowne\u2019s counsel and their e\u2011discovery vendor) but were <em>never reviewed or produced<\/em>. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The content of at least one of the emails includes a statement by a Thom\u202fBrowne senior\u2011executive that, given adidas\u2019s dominance in sportswear, \u201cit is inevitable that our four\u2011bar in white be read as adidas stripes\u201d (at least on accessories). Adidas says this would have been powerful impeachment evidence. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Because of this non\u2011production, adidas argues the 2023 jury verdict and the subsequent defence should be reopened under Rule\u202f60(b)(3) (fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct) rather than Rule\u202f60(b)(2) (newly discovered evidence). It argues that to allow mere negligence to count as misconduct would blur the lines and allow \u201cdisguise\u201d of one avenue under another. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Thom\u202fBrowne\u2019s position:\n<ul>\n<li>The company argues that \u201cmisconduct\u201d should require intent or recklessness, not simple inadvertent or negligent non\u2011production. They say they used a reputable vendor, had a manual \u201cto\u2011be\u2011reviewed\u201d list, and the non\u2011production was an understandable oversight among a large volume of documents. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>They argue that the withheld emails (even if produced) would unlikely have changed the outcome \u2014 the jury\u2019s verdict turned on visual comparison of designs and experts\u2019 testimony rather than those emails. The district judge (Judge\u202fJed\u202fRakoff) found the emails marginal and declined relief under Rule\u202f60(b). (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Legal_procedural_significance\"><\/span>Legal \/ procedural significance<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The key legal question: Does non\u2011production of documents amount to \u201cmisconduct\u201d under Rule\u202f60(b)(3)? And if so, what level of culpability is required \u2014 simple negligence, recklessness, or intentional suppression? The appellate court panel pressed both sides on this question. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The judges in the oral argument (Second Circuit) asked: if mere negligence qualifies as \u201cmisconduct\u201d, then many discovery mistakes could be recast under 60(b)(3) and would bypass the stricter standard of 60(b)(2). That could undermine finality of judgments. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>One judge asked pointedly: if the documents were flagged for review yet never reviewed, \u201cif that\u2019s not negligence, what is?\u201d This underlines how the court is grappling with the boundary. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The outcome of the appeal will inform how strictly future litigants must treat discovery obligations, especially large e\u2011discovery volumes where oversight might be claimed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Implications_for_the_brands\"><\/span>Implications for the brands<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>For adidas: If they succeed in showing misconduct, they may reopen the case and potentially get a new trial or other relief. This could challenge Thom\u202fBrowne\u2019s victory or put pressure on settlement. It underscores adidas\u2019s determination to protect the three\u2011stripe mark.<\/li>\n<li>For Thom\u202fBrowne: The dispute underscores how even frivolous\u2011looking design differences (four bars vs three stripes) can turn into intense multi\u2011jurisdiction IP battles. The potential exposure of internal emails could raise reputational risk and increase cost of litigation.<\/li>\n<li>For IP practitioners: The case highlights the importance of discovery compliance, document production, e\u2011discovery vendor oversight and internal review. Even luxury fashion litigation is subject to the same procedural rigour as tech or pharma disputes.<\/li>\n<li>For brand strategy: The case signals that large brands will push aggressively to defend icons (three stripes) and that challengers (Thom\u202fBrowne) must not only win on substance (design difference) but also on procedural cleanliness.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bottom%E2%80%91line_summary\"><\/span>Bottom\u2011line summary<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Adidas\u2019s current appeal centres not on the core question of infringement (that has been decided against them in multiple jurisdictions) but on <em>procedural grounds<\/em>: namely, the non\u2011production of internal emails by Thom\u202fBrowne. Adidas argues this failure constitutes misconduct under Rule\u202f60(b)(3), warranting reopening of the verdict. Thom\u202fBrowne counters that the failure was inadvertent, the withheld emails marginal, and the verdict stands. The appellate panel is grappling with how to define \u201cmisconduct\u201d in the context of large\u2011scale document review.<\/p>\n<p>Here are <strong>detailed case\u2011studies<\/strong> of the dispute between adidas and Thom Browne focusing on the emails\/non\u2011production issue, followed by commentary on what it implies for IP litigation, discovery practices and brand strategy.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Study%E2%80%AF1_US_Litigation_%E2%80%93_Email_Non%E2%80%91Production_Rule%E2%80%AF60b_Appeal\"><\/span>Case Study\u202f1: U.S. Litigation \u2013 Email Non\u2011Production &amp; Rule\u202f60(b) Appeal<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Facts<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>In the U.S., adidas sued Thom Browne claiming infringement of the \u201cthree\u2011stripe\u201d mark by Thom Browne\u2019s \u201cfour\u2011bar\u201d design. A jury found in Thom Browne\u2019s favour. (<a title=\"Designer Thom Browne bests Adidas in court battle of stripes\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/fada779442cc217037d1e838d04f6359?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">AP News<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>After the verdict, adidas sought relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). They alleged that Thom Browne failed to produce <strong>four internal emails<\/strong> during discovery\u2014even though those emails had been collected\/flagged for review by Thom Browne\u2019s e\u2011discovery vendor. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was Misconduct\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The content of one key email: a senior Thom Browne executive allegedly wrote that given adidas\u2019s dominance in sportswear, \u201cit is inevitable that our four\u2011bar in white be read as adidas stripes,\u201d at least on accessories. That, adidas argues, constitutes powerful impeachment evidence. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was Misconduct\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The court (Judge Jed\u202fRakoff) found that although the emails were relevant, adidas had <em>not<\/em> shown that they \u201cprobably would have changed the outcome of the trial\u201d and did not find sanction\u2011worthy misconduct. (<a title=\"Judge Rakoff: Unproduced Emails -- Although Relevant\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sdnyblog.com\/judge-rakoff-unproduced-emails-although-relevant-do-not-warrant-new-trial-or-sanctions\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">sdnyblog.com<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>On appeal before the Second Circuit, adidas\u2019s argument: The non\u2011production amounted to <strong>misconduct<\/strong> under Rule\u202f60(b)(3) (\u201cfraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party\u201d) rather than simple negligence under 60(b)(2) (\u201cnew evidence\u201d). They contend the difference matters because 60(b)(3) is not subject to the same \u201cnew evidence likely to change verdict\u201d threshold. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was Misconduct\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Thom Browne\u2019s counter\u2011argument: \u201cMisconduct\u201d requires at least recklessness or intentional suppression, not mere inadvertent oversight. They argue that in large\u2011scale e\u2011discovery, mistakes happen and that the jury\u2019s verdict turned on visual design comparison, not those emails. (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was Misconduct\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Why this matters<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>It is a vivid example of how <strong>discovery\u2011process issues<\/strong> (not just core liability issues) can become central to high\u2011stakes brand litigation.<\/li>\n<li>It shows the interplay between procedural relief (60(b)) and substantive claims (infringement). Even if the core claim failed, adidas is using procedural grounds to seek a rehearing.<\/li>\n<li>The nature of the withheld emails (internal recognition of \u201cinevitable confusion\u201d or acknowledgement of risk) demonstrates how brands must manage internal communications carefully\u2014especially when litigation is ongoing or likely.<\/li>\n<li>For IP practitioners: the case highlights how failure to produce internal documents\u2014even if \u201cmistaken\u201d or \u201cinadvertent\u201d\u2014can lead to attempts to reopen verdicts and deepen legal cost\/risk.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Study%E2%80%AF2_UK_Litigation_%E2%80%93_Position_Marks_Broader_Brand_Strategy\"><\/span>Case Study\u202f2: UK Litigation \u2013 Position Marks &amp; Broader Brand Strategy<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>In the UK, Thom Browne challenged adidas\u2019s \u201cthree\u2011stripe\u201d position marks (marks where the stripes are applied in certain positions on garments) and succeeded: the High Court declared eight registrations invalid for lack of clarity\/precision. (<a title=\"adidas v Thom Browne: Court of Appeal upholds invalidity ...\" href=\"https:\/\/ipkitten.blogspot.com\/2025\/10\/adidas-v-thom-browne-court-of-appeal.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The IPKat<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The Court of Appeal dismissed adidas\u2019s appeal of six of those invalidations on 23 October 2025, upholding the principle that a trade mark must be \u201cclear, precise and objectively ascertainable\u201d and that adidas\u2019s mark descriptions allowed a multiplicity of signs. (<a title=\"Court of Appeal upholds the invalidity of adidas three stripe ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oeclaw.co.uk\/news\/view\/court-of-appeal-upholds-the-invalidity-of-adidas-three-stripe-position-marks?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">oeclaw.co.uk<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>While the email discovery issue is principally in the U.S. litigation, the UK outcome affects adidas\u2019s global enforcement strategy and demonstrates how brand\u2011icon claims (three stripes) can be vulnerable if registrations are not tightly defined.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Why this matters<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>It evidences the <strong>global dimension<\/strong> of brand\u2011protection litigation: what happens in U.S. and UK courts both impacts brand strategy, cost, global enforcement risk.<\/li>\n<li>The UK decision puts brands on notice that <strong>position marks<\/strong> (e.g., stripes on garments) must be narrowly defined and described \u2014 mere fame does not suffice if the mark is vague.<\/li>\n<li>Combined with the U.S. procedural dispute, it shows brands must manage both substantive and procedural risks: internal communications, discovery processes, and registration precision all matter.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Comments_Reflections\"><\/span>Comments &amp; Reflections<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><strong>\u202fKey Observations<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Discovery and internal communications are increasingly critical in brand\u2011litigation: a line such as \u201cit is inevitable that our four\u2011bar \u2026 be read as adidas stripes\u201d is gold for an opponent\u2019s case and must be carefully managed.<\/li>\n<li>Procedural remedies (e.g., Rule 60(b)) can offer brands a back\u2011door attempt to relitigate adverse outcomes \u2014 so courts will expect robust document production and vendor oversight.<\/li>\n<li>Brands with iconic marks may be tempted to rely on fame alone \u2014 but the UK decision reminds that careful registration drafting (clear description + image) remains fundamental.<\/li>\n<li>For challengers\/defendants (like Thom Browne), the case illustrates how disciplined record\u2011keeping, review processes, and clear differentiation (four bars versus three stripes) can yield success.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Caveats &amp; Risks<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Even major brands can stumble on procedural matters \u2014 adidas\u2019s focus on the email error shows how process can undermine otherwise strong substantive cases.<\/li>\n<li>Expanding \u201cmisconduct\u201d definitions in discovery (to include negligence) could open floodgates of post\u2011trial applications; courts grapple with balancing finality and fairness. (\u201cOne judge asked: if documents were tagged and never reviewed, \u2018if that\u2019s not negligence, what is?\u2019\u201d (<a title=\"Adidas Says Thom Browne's Email &quot;Mistake&quot; Was Misconduct\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thefashionlaw.com\/in-appeal-adidas-says-thom-brownes-email-mistake-was-misconduct\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Fashion Law<\/a>) )<\/li>\n<li>Brands must consider reputational risk: aggressive use of procedural tactics, and internal memos acknowledging risk of confusion, may impact public brand narrative (especially in luxury\/fashion).<\/li>\n<li>Global brands must coordinate across jurisdictions: what\u2019s valid in one country (mark registration) may be invalid elsewhere; discovery obligations differ (U.S. vs UK data\u2011requests, e\u2011discovery volumes).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>\u00a0Strategic Takeaways for Brands &amp; Legal Teams<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Maintain rigorous internal\u2011communication protocols: emails\/internally documented risk assessments, strategy discussions should assume potential future disclosure.<\/li>\n<li>Vendor management: If your brand uses e\u2011discovery vendors, archive systems, document\u2011review workflows \u2014 ensure high reliability, cross\u2011checks and audits.<\/li>\n<li>Registration drafting: For position marks or sensor marks (stripes, bars, etc), ensure descriptions and images tightly defined. Avoid \u201cone\u2011third or more of the sleeve\u201d ambiguity (which was a key problem for adidas in the UK). (<a title=\"Adidas loses Court of Appeal battle over three-stripe trade marks\" href=\"https:\/\/iclg.com\/news\/23198-adidas-loses-court-of-appeal-battle-over-three-stripe-trade-marks?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">ICLG Business Reports<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Global enforcement strategies: Recognise that litigation will play out in multiple jurisdictions; coordinate registration, enforcement and discovery strategies globally \u2014 e.g., U.S. process, UK invalidity challenges, cross\u2011border consistency.<\/li>\n<li>Risk mitigation: When litigating iconic marks, include risk modelling for procedural exposure (discovery missteps), not just substantive liability. Prepare for appeal\u2011based procedural challenges.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Final_Summary\"><\/span>Final Summary<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The adidas\u2011Thom\u202fBrowne dispute is more than a stripes\u2011vs\u2011bars design fight. It is a rich example of how <strong>discovery process<\/strong>, <strong>internal communications<\/strong>, <strong>registration precision<\/strong>, and <strong>global litigation strategy<\/strong> all intersect in modern brand enforcement. The email \u201cmistake\u201d (or non\u2011production) may seem a small part of the dispute, but it has the potential to reopen entire cases under misconduct\/relief rules. For brands, the lesson is clear: you must treat procedural and document\u2011governance risks with the same seriousness as your substantive mark\u2011strategy.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Background to the case adidas sued Thom\u202fBrowne in the U.S. (and is continuing to pursue related litigation) over Thom\u202fBrowne\u2019s \u201cfour\u2011bar\u201d stripe design, alleging it&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[270,90],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digital-marketing","category-news-update"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Adidas Argues in Appeal That Thom Browne\u2019s Email \u201cError\u201d Constitutes Misconduct - Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Adidas Argues in Appeal That Thom Browne\u2019s Email \u201cError\u201d Constitutes Misconduct - Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&nbsp; Background to the case adidas sued Thom\u202fBrowne in the U.S. (and is continuing to pursue related litigation) over Thom\u202fBrowne\u2019s \u201cfour\u2011bar\u201d stripe design, alleging it...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-01T14:10:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/551c62581e407fcec8cf1f76df97b5d2\"},\"headline\":\"Adidas Argues in Appeal That Thom Browne\u2019s Email \u201cError\u201d Constitutes Misconduct\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-01T14:10:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/\"},\"wordCount\":1984,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Digital Marketing\",\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/\",\"name\":\"Adidas Argues in Appeal That Thom Browne\u2019s Email \u201cError\u201d Constitutes Misconduct - Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-01T14:10:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Adidas Argues in Appeal That Thom Browne\u2019s Email \u201cError\u201d Constitutes Misconduct\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog\",\"description\":\"Email Marketing Tools &amp; Digital Marketing Updates\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cropped-lite-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cropped-lite-logo.png\",\"width\":191,\"height\":178,\"caption\":\"Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/551c62581e407fcec8cf1f76df97b5d2\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/37de671670ea9023731c3f3ef83c84b6d7d6faeffecd87fb98e3ec10aecc15bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/37de671670ea9023731c3f3ef83c84b6d7d6faeffecd87fb98e3ec10aecc15bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Adidas Argues in Appeal That Thom Browne\u2019s Email \u201cError\u201d Constitutes Misconduct - Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Adidas Argues in Appeal That Thom Browne\u2019s Email \u201cError\u201d Constitutes Misconduct - Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog","og_description":"&nbsp; Background to the case adidas sued Thom\u202fBrowne in the U.S. (and is continuing to pursue related litigation) over Thom\u202fBrowne\u2019s \u201cfour\u2011bar\u201d stripe design, alleging it...","og_url":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/","og_site_name":"Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog","article_published_time":"2025-11-01T14:10:43+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/551c62581e407fcec8cf1f76df97b5d2"},"headline":"Adidas Argues in Appeal That Thom Browne\u2019s Email \u201cError\u201d Constitutes Misconduct","datePublished":"2025-11-01T14:10:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/"},"wordCount":1984,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Digital Marketing","News"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/","url":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/","name":"Adidas Argues in Appeal That Thom Browne\u2019s Email \u201cError\u201d Constitutes Misconduct - Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-11-01T14:10:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/2025\/11\/01\/adidas-argues-in-appeal-that-thom-brownes-email-error-constitutes-misconduct\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Adidas Argues in Appeal That Thom Browne\u2019s Email \u201cError\u201d Constitutes Misconduct"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/","name":"Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog","description":"Email Marketing Tools &amp; Digital Marketing Updates","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#organization","name":"Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog","url":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cropped-lite-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cropped-lite-logo.png","width":191,"height":178,"caption":"Lite14 Tools &amp; Blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/551c62581e407fcec8cf1f76df97b5d2","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/37de671670ea9023731c3f3ef83c84b6d7d6faeffecd87fb98e3ec10aecc15bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/37de671670ea9023731c3f3ef83c84b6d7d6faeffecd87fb98e3ec10aecc15bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/lite14.net\/blog"],"url":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17301"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17301\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17302,"href":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17301\/revisions\/17302"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lite14.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}